🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". A law may be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," stated one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government committed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.