🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. Over this time, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, about half of the global top fifty tech companies are US-based, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior efficiency gains in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have grown into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity raises a vital issue: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two between the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several key factors explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hinder European business. A American entrepreneur can introduce a product under one set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was once met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Key analyses on European competitiveness and the single market point to the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets could support much higher levels of commercial innovation.

Europe retains significant strengths: high-quality workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically boost economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.