🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for data to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.